
Thursday, July 31, 2008
To Preachers

Wednesday, July 30, 2008
Reflections by Will Rogers

"Everything nowadays is a saying, or a slogan. You can't go to bed, you can't get up, you can't brush your teeth, without doing it to some advertising slogan. Even the government is in on it. The Navy has a slogan: "Join the Navy and see the World!" You join, and all you see for the first 4 years is a bucket of soap suds and a mop, and some brass polish.
Congress even has slogans:
"Why sleep at home, when you can sleep in Congress?"
"Be a Politician - no training necessary"
"It's easier to fool 'em in Washington than at home - so why not be a Senator."
Even if you want to get married, a sign will stare you in the face: "Two can live as cheap as one." That, next to "Law Enforcement", is the biggest bunk slogan ever invented. Then the preacher says: "Let no man put asunder," and two-thirds of the married world is asunder in less than three months.
Last election, out came the slogan makers again. Some fool that didn't know American politics had J.W.Davis run on "Honesty". Well, that had no more place in politics than I have on the Harvard faculty. It was one of the poorest selections of a slogan that was ever invented. Coolidge ran on "Economy", and "Common Sense", which is always good for the boobs. It's like getting up at a dinner and saying: "I am proud to be here". It's an old gag, but it always goes over. Now you know "Common Sense" is not an issue in politics. It's an affliction. And as for "Honesty", neither is that an issue, it's a miracle. And the returns showed that there was 8 million more people in the United States who had the "Common Sense" not to believe that there was "Honesty" in politics. And as soon as the "Economy" boys got in, they raised Congress' and the Senate's salary and redecorated the White House. So away goes another slogan!
You see, a fool slogan can get you into anything. But you never heard of a slogan getting you out of anything. It takes either bullets, hard work or money to get you out of anything. Nobody has ever invented a slogan to use instead of paying your taxes.
But they will fall for 'em. You shake a slogan at an American, and it's just like showing a hungry dog a bone. We even die by slogans. I saw an undertaker's sign the other day, which read: "There is a satisfaction in dying, if you know the Woodlawn Brothers are to bury you." "
Tuesday, July 29, 2008
The Huguenot Cross
Not long after the revocation of the Edict of Nantes, the Huguenot Cross came into general use amongst Huguenots as confirmation of the wearer's faith. The symbolism of the Huguenot cross is particularly rich.
The cross was designed in the form of a Maltese cross: four isosceles triangles meeting at the centre. Each triangle has, at the periphery, two rounded points at the corners. These points are regarded as signifying the eight Beatitudes of Matthew 5: 3-10. Suspended from the lower triangle by a ring of gold is a pendant dove with spreaded wings in downward flight, signifying the Holy Spirit. In times of persecution a pearl, symbolizing a teardrop, replaced the dove (Revelation 21:4).
The four arms of the Maltese cross are sometimes regarded as the heraldic form of the four petals of the Lily of France (golden yellow irises, signifying the Mother Country of France) which grows in the south of France. The lily is also the symbol of purity. The arms symbolize the four Gospels.
The arms are joined together by four Fleur-de-Lis, each with 3 petals; the total of twelve petals of the Fleur-de-Lis signify the twelve apostles. Between each Fleur-de-Lis and the arms of the Maltese Cross with which it is joined, an open space in the form of a heart, which symbolizes loyalty and the sufferings of Christ, suggests the seal of the French Reformer, John Calvin.
Monday, July 28, 2008
History of the Huguenots - Part 2 - Conclusion
The Huguenots were allowed to practice their faith in 20 specified French "free" cities. France became united and a decade of peace followed. After Henry IV was murdered in 1610, however, the persecution of the "dissenters" resumed in all earnestness under the guidance of Cardinal Richelieu, whose favorite project was the extermination of the Huguenots.
(conclusion)
Henry IV's weakling sun, Louis the Thirteenth, refused them the privileges which had been granted to them by the Edict of Nantes; and, when reminded of the claims they had, if the promises of Henry the Third and Henry the Fourth were to be regarded, he answered that "the first-named monarch feared them, and the latter loved them; but I neither fear nor love them." The Huguenot free cities were lost one after the other after they were conquered by the forces of Cardinal Richelieu, and the last and most important stronghold, La Rochelle, fell in 1629 after a siege lasting a month.
Louis XIV (the Sun King, 1643-1715) began to apply his motto l'état c'est moi ("I am the state") and introduced the infamous Dragonnades - the billeting of dragoons in Huguenot households. He began with a policy of une foi, un loi, un roi (one faith, one law, one king) and revoked the Edict of Nantes on 22 October 1685. The large scale persecution of the Huguenots resumed. Protestant churches and the houses of "obstinates" were burned and destroyed, and their bibles and hymn books burned. Emigration was declared illegal. Many Huguenots were burned at the stake. Many Huguenots who did not find their death in local prisons or execution on the wheel of torture, were shipped to sea to serve their sentences as galley slaves, either on French galley ships, or sold to Turkey as galley slaves.
A vivid account of the life of galley-slaves in France is given in Jean Marteilhes's Memoirs of a Protestant, translated by Oliver Goldsmith, which describes the experiences of one of the Huguenots who suffered after the revocation of the Edict of Nantes.
Every Huguenot place of worship was to be destroyed; every minister who refused to conform was to be sent to the Hôpitaux de Forçats at Marseilles and at Valance. If he had been noted for his zeal he was to be considered "obstinate," and sent to slavery for life in such of the West-Indian islands as belonged to the French. The children of Huguenot parents were to be taken from them by force, and educated by the Roman Catholic monks or nuns.
At least 250 000 French Huguenots fled to countries such as Switzerland, Germany, England, America, the Netherlands, Poland and South Africa, where they could enjoy religious freedom. As many were killed in France itself. Between 1618 and 1725 between 5,000 and 7,000 Huguenots reached the shores of America. Those who came from the French speaking south of Belgium, an area known as Wallonia, are generally known as Walloons (as opposed to Huguenots) in the United States.
The organised large scale emigration of Hugenots to the Cape of Good Hope in South Africa occurred during 1688 - 1689. Most of them settled in an area now known as Franschhoek ("French Corner"), some 70 km outside Cape Town, where many farms still bear their original French names.
A century later the promulgation of the Edict of Toleration on 28 November 1787 partially restored the civil and religious rights of the Huguenots in France.
Excerpted from Huguenot Web Site www.huguenot.ws
Sunday, July 27, 2008
History of the Huguenots - Part 1

My paternal uncle is the historian in our family and I have seemed to have inherited his phobia. In tracing our family tree I ran into a problem. Our current surname had been changed from whatever it was to what it is now. Why the name change? It seems that my family was of Huguenot descent and had been one of the thousands of families that fled to Switzerland during the many Huguenot persecutions in France and when they arrived in their new home their names were changed to adapt to the circumstance of their new location. So, our family has inherited a new name and a link to those persecuted Christians of the past that fled to religious freedom. I am happy to be part of that heritage both biologically and spiritually. And, I have many relatives living in Switzerland today who enjoy the connection with those French martyrs. So, with somewhat of a personal bias I will share with you some of my ancestral history and will, from time-to-time share information relating to the history of other Christian martyrs.
The Huguenots were French Protestants who were members of the Reformed Church which was established in 1550 by John Calvin.
The origin of the name Huguenot is uncertain, but dates from approximately 1550 when it was used in court cases against "heretics" (dissenters from the Roman Catholic Church). O.I.A. Roche, in his book The Days of the Upright, a History of the Huguenots, writes that "Huguenot" is
"a combination of a Flemish and a German word. In the Flemish corner of France, Bible students who gathered in each other's houses to study secretly were called Huisgenooten, or "house fellows," while on the Swiss and German borders they were termed Eidgenossen, or "oath fellows," that is, persons bound to each other by an oath. Gallicized into "Huguenot," often used deprecatingly, the word became, during two and a half centuries of terror and triumph, a badge of enduring honor and courage."
As nickname and even abusive name it's use was banned in the regulations of the Edict of Nantes which Henry IV (Henry of Navarre, who himself earlier was a Huguenot) issued in 1598. The French Protestants themselves preferred to refer to themselves as "réformees" (reformers) rather than "Huguenots".
It was much later that the name "Huguenot" became an honorary one of which their descendants are proud.
A general edict which encouraged the extermination of the Huguenots was issued on January 29th, 1536 in France. On March 1st, 1562 some 1200 Huguenots were slain at Vassy, France. This ignited the the Wars of Religion which would rip apart, devastate, and bankrupt France for the next three decades.
During the infamous St Bartholomew Massacre of the night of 23/24 August, 1572 more than 8,000 Huguenots, including Admiral Gaspard de Coligny, Governor of Picardy and leader and spokesman of the Huguenots, were murdered in Paris. It happened during the wedding of Henry of Navarre, a Huguenot, to Marguerite de Valois (daughter of Catherine de Medici), when thousands of Huguenots converged on Paris for the wedding celebrations.
It was Catherine de Medici who persuaded her weakling son Charles IX to order the mass murder, which lasted three days and spread to the countryside. On Sunday morning August 24th, 1572 she personally walked through the streets of Paris to inspect the carnage. Henry of Navarre's life was spared when he pretended to support the Roman Catholic faith. In 1593 he made his "perilous leap"and abjured his faith in July 1593, and 5 years later he was the undisputed monarch as King Henry IV (le bon Henri, the good Henry) of France.
When the first rumours of the massacre reached the Vatican in Rome on 2 September 1572, pope Gregory XIII was jubilant and wanted bonfires to be lit in Rome. He was persuaded to wait for the official communication. The very morning of the day that he received the confirmed news, the pope held a consistory and announced that "God had been pleased to be merciful". Then with all the cardinals he repaired to the Church of St. Mark for the Te Deum, and prayed and ordered prayers that the Most Christian King might rid and purge his entire kingdom (of France) of the Huguenot plague.
On 8 September 1572 a procession of thanksgiving took place in Rome, and the pope, in a prayer after mass, thanked God for having "granted the Catholic people a glorious triumph over a perfidious race" (gloriosam de perfidis gentibus populo catholico loetitiam tribuisti).
Gregory XIII engaged Vasari to paint scenes in one of the Vatican apartments of the triumph of the Most Christian King over the Huguenots. He had a medal struck representing an exterminating angel smiting the Huguenots with his sword, the inscription reading: Hugonottorium strages (Huguenot conspirators). In France itself, the French magistracy ordered the admiral to be burned in effigy and prayers and processions of thanksgiving on each recurring 24th August, out of gratitude to God for the victory over the Huguenots.
The Edict of Nantes was signed by Henry IV on April 13th, 1598, which brought an end to the Wars of Religion.
The Huguenots were allowed to practice their faith in 20 specified French "free" cities. France became united and a decade of peace followed. After Henry IV was murdered in 1610, however, the persecution of the "dissenters" resumed in all earnestness under the guidance of Cardinal Richelieu, whose favorite project was the extermination of the Huguenots.
(To be continued)
Excerpted from Huguenot Web Site www.huguenot.ws
Saturday, July 26, 2008
On Receiving Criticism

Zondervan Publishing House, 1954 Edition, Pg. 332
Thursday, July 24, 2008
Pragmatism: Trend or Trap?

Just posted at the Pulpit Magazine blogsite is an article by Pastor John MacArthur regarding the pragmatic approach in today's post-Christian churches. Very concise and insightful. I've posted a few snippets for your immediate gratification but be sure to read the entire article yourself.
"As Christians, we are called to trust what the Lord says, preach that message to others, and leave the results to Him. But many have set that aside. Seeking relevancy and success, they have welcomed the pragmatic approach and have received the proverbial Trojan horse.
Church leaders reacted to the world's indifference, not by a return to strong biblical preaching that emphasized sin and repentance, but by a pragmatic approach to "doing" church — an approach driven more by marketing, methodology, and perceived results than by biblical doctrine. The new model of ministry revolved around making sinners feel comfortable and at ease in the church, then selling them on the benefits of becoming a Christian.
Even the church's ministry to its own has changed. "Whatever works," the mantra of pragmatism, has become the new banner of evangelicalism.
Many of today's church leaders have bought into the subtlety of pragmatism without recognizing the dangers it poses. Instead of attacking orthodoxy head on, evangelical pragmatism gives lip service to the truth while quietly undermining the foundations of doctrine.
First, there is in vogue today a trend to make the basis of faith something other than God's Word.
Second, evangelical pragmatism tends to move the focus of faith away from God's Son.
The health-wealth-and-prosperity gospel...fantasy faith. This false gospel appeals unabashedly to the flesh.
Easy-believism... has done much to popularize "believing" but little to provoke sincere faith.
Third, today's Christianity is infected with a tendency to view the result of faith as something less than God's standard of holy living. By downplaying the importance of holy living–both by precept and by example–the biblical doctrine of conversion is undermined.
If we fight to maintain doctrinal purity with an emphasis on biblical preaching and biblical ministry, we can conquer external attacks. But if error is allowed into the church, many more churches will slide down the grade to suffer the same fate as the denominations that listened to, yet ignored, Spurgeon's impassioned appeal."
By John MacArthur posted July 24th, 2008 at Pulpit Magazine (www.sfpulpit.com.) Click on link to view entire post.
Monday, July 21, 2008
Our Own Hearts
The "bugbears" of the heart in spiritual darkness are many, and generally occur as the result of human judgments and emotions unregulated by the Word and Spirit of God.
Thomas Goodwin
Rhinelander Bible Conference

Sunday, July 20, 2008
A Measure of Bible Study

A.W. Pink (Profiting From the Word, pg.18. Publ. Banner of Truth 1971, distributed by Chapel Library)
Saturday, July 19, 2008
New Meeting Place

Directions: From the north, take Highway 27 to County Highway P. Turn right (west) on CTH P, go about 1/4 mile and turn right on Grant Drive. Turn right on Zeny Lane. We are located on the corner lot near the Stefan Pavilion. If you are coming from the south look for CTH P about two miles north of the Kuc Implement dealership.
We meet on Sunday mornings for Bible Study at 10:00 a.m. followed by our Worship Service at 11:00 a.m. We have a fellowship meal immediately following the Worship Service. Sunday evening we meet at 6:30 p.m. Wednesday night at 7:00 p.m. for Bible Study followed by prayer.
If you're discouraged with post-modern, "christianity" (so called) and are interested in learning more about the Sovereignty of God as revealed in the Scriptures, uplifting the Lord Jesus Christ as the ONLY Way, Truth and Life, and desire to live a life of obedience to Christ, please visit us.
Friday, July 18, 2008
The Waldensians - A Short History
By Stuart Williams
Valdes and the early Waldensians
In 1174, a French businessman in Lyons, Valdes, was challenged by the radical teaching of Jesus in the Gospels and responded by committing himself to a life of voluntary poverty and preaching. He experienced a dramatic conversion, renounced his previous business practices, threw his money out into the street, and after running a soup kitchen during the famine of 1176, began a new life as an itinerant preacher.
There had been other wandering preachers in the Middle Ages who had acted in a similar way. What was different about Valdes, apart from being a layman, was his concern to have the Bible translated into the local dialect, and his success in gathering a group of followers, drawn from different social classes, but sharing a life of poverty and preaching. Their preaching and the provision of a Bible people could understand led the formation of a lay association, known as the ‘Poor in Spirit’. Taking Jesus’ sending out of the Seventy as their pattern, they formed apostolic missionary bands, wore rough clothes and sandals and went around preaching a message of repentance.
They had no intention of separating from the Catholic Church. They simply wanted to live as whole-hearted followers of Jesus. But the challenge of their simple lifestyle, the popularity of this new movement and their unauthorised preaching aroused local opposition. They were in breach of canon law that restricted doctrinal preaching to the clergy. Valdes appealed for permission to preach. The Pope, while approving their motives and vows of poverty, insisted they were not to preach unless invited by local clergy. They must remain within the discipline of the established church. But, as they grew more aware of the corruption of the church, they continued their unauthorised preaching and began to face trouble. The archbishop of
French Waldensians enjoyed peace and freedom in many areas of the country until the 1230s. Persecution increased then, however, driving the movement underground and detaching its less committed members. Numbers fell steadily during this century, and early in the next century, inquisitors found few traces of the movement in its area of origin. Waldensians survived by retreating into quietism or into the mountains, where they formed communities that were too remote to bother the authorities. In
In 1487 a determined campaign against Waldensians was launched, which resulted in executions, emigration and the return of some to the Catholic Church. The survival of the movement into the sixteenth century was the result of the resilience of small groups and the courage and faithfulness of travelling leaders who continued to visit these isolated communities.
By the start of the sixteenth century, much of the heat had gone out of the conflict in the
Waldensian beliefs
An 800-year history presents difficulties in trying to set out the beliefs and practices of the Waldensians. These were not uniform everywhere or throughout the centuries, but there are some common features.
(1) Anti-clericalism. Waldensians preached a simple message of repentance, individual responsibility and holy living. They criticised the corruption of the clergy and denied that such men should be trusted. Instead they endorsed lay Bible study. The movement was marked by deep love for the Bible and passionate desire to understand and obey it. They were committed to a ‘believers’ church ecclesiology, where the local congregation ordered its life together, and they were determined to submit to biblical authority alone.
(2) Church structure. There was emphasis on the priesthood of all believers, men and women. The role of the preachers was crucial for the movement, but these leaders were not ordained, nor generally regarded as belonging to a separate class of Christians, nor ranked in any kind of hierarchy. They were committed to a life of celibacy, travelling and poverty, dependent for their support on the gifts of members of the movement. Once trained, they were sent out in pairs to visit scattered groups. Those who were not preachers remained in their homes and jobs, devoting time to Bible study and nurturing their faith in secret. They collected support for the preachers, ran training schools in their homes and, where they could, tried to draw others into the movement.
(3) Ethical integrity. They were not interested in speculative theology or doctrinal issues, but in spirituality and ethics. They called people to follow Jesus and obey his teachings. They advocated personal integrity, simple lifestyle and rejection of greed and excess. They opposed all forms of lying and deception. They also generally rejected the swearing of oaths. And usually they practised what they preached.
(4) Non-violence. Early Waldensians were committed to non-violence, deriving this emphasis from a literal reading of the Gospels. They spoke out against violence: crusades against infidels and warfare in general; killing Jews; execution of thieves who were caught stealing food for their families in times of famine; capital punishment; and coercion in matters of faith. This instinctive non-violence persisted through the centuries, though there are instances of Waldensians resorting to violence. Generally, this was provoked by repression, or the threat presented by defectors who might betray them, and was regarded as necessary to defend homes and family. Occasionally, there seem to have been attempts to use violence for political ends, as a form of revolutionary action.
(5) Rejection of superstition. Waldensians discovered that some familiar Catholic practices had no biblical basis. Gradually they removed these practices from their churches in order to cut back their church life to the simpler pattern they found in the New Testament. They rejected prayers for the dead, regarded indulgences as benefiting greedy priests and challenged the doctrine of purgatory. They rejected official fast days and refused to bow before altars, venerate crosses or treat as special holy bread or water. Somewhat surprisingly, many retained devotion to Mary, despite the teachings of their leaders.
(6) The sacraments. They regarded communion as a remembrance, not a sacrifice, and allowed all to take bread and wine. They rejected the theology of the mass and were dubious about the idea of transubstantiation. Initially many continued to receive communion from the priests, but increasingly communion was celebrated in their homes without clerical involvement. On baptism, there was uncertainty. They were not fully convinced infant baptism was biblical or appropriate, but they seem rarely to have abandoned it.
(7) Confession. The importance of confessing sins, doing penance and receiving absolution was retained throughout the movement. Although some continued to confess to the Catholic priests, in many places their low view of priests precluded these as suitable candidates to hear confession. The natural alternative was the travelling preachers, and they certainly performed this role, but the underlying conviction that all believers were priests allowed the development of the practice of confession to one another.
(8)
Posted on www.anabaptistnetwork.com/waldensians
Thursday, July 17, 2008
The Need of Decision For The Truth
“I believe the doctrine of election, because I am quite sure that if God had not chosen me I should never have chosen Him; and I am sure He chose me before I was born, or else He never would have chosen me afterwards; and He must have elected me for reasons unknown to me, for I never could find any reason in myself why He should have looked upon me with special love. So I am forced to accept that doctrine. I am bound to the doctrine of the depravity of the human heart, because I find myself depraved in heart, and have daily proofs that there dwelleth in my flesh no good thing. I cannot help holding that there must be an atonement before there can be pardon, because my conscience demands it, and my peace depends upon it.
Those young fellows who never felt conviction of sin, but obtained their religion as they get their bath in the morning, by jumping into it – these will as readily leap out of it as they leaped in. Those who feel neither the joys nor yet the depressions of spirit which indicate spiritual life, are torpid, and their palsied hand has no firm grip of truth. They believe this, and then believe that, for, in truth, they believe nothing intensely.
Whenever I hear the sceptic’s stale attacks upon the Word of God, I smile within myself and thin, “Why, you simpleton! How can you urge such trifling objections? I have felt, in the contentions of my own unbelief, ten times greater difficulties.” We who have contended with horses are not to be wearied by footmen. Gordon Cumming and other lion-killers are not to be scared by wild cats, nor will those who have stood foot to foot with Satan resign the field to pretentious skeptics, or any other of the evil one’s inferior servants.
If, my brethren, we have fellowship with the Lord Jesus Christ, we cannot be made to doubt the fundamentals of the gospel; neither can we be undecided. A glimpse at the thorn-crowned head and pierced hands and feet is the sure cure for ‘modern doubt’ and all its vagaries.
Go with your skepticisms to those who do not know whom they have believed. We have heard, and we do testify; and whether men receive our testimony or not, we cannot but speak it, for we speak what we do know, and testify what we have seen. That, my brethren, is the sure way to be decided."
From Lectures To My Students, by CH Spurgeon, (published by Zondervan,1954 Edition pg. 227)
Waldensian Seal

The oval shield of the emblem of the Waldensian Church is encircled with the Latin inscription, "Lux Lucet In Tenebris", or "The light shineth in the darkness." Within the oval a lighted candle spreads its light as a reminder of the Savior's command, "Let your light shine before men, that they may see your good works and glorify your Father who is in heaven, Matthew 5:16. Encircling the lighted candle are seven golden stars representing the angels of the seven early churches in the book of Revelations. The use of the seven stars suggests the antiquity of the Waldensian Church. The stars appear on a field of dark blue representing the darkness of night.
Two green branches, one of oak usually on the right and one of laurel usually on the left, tied together with a light blue ribbon partially surround the shield. The green oak symbolizes strength or power. The green laurel stands for hope and glory. Together they represent the hope, power and glory of God. Often the Waldensian Seal is shown with only two branches of laurel. This laurel wreath represents "The Church Triumphant."
(courtesy of Old Colony Players www.oldcolonyplayers.com)